0
ActivityTeam

Further Resources

The Art of Not Stuffing Up When Everyone's Ready to Explode: Why Most Difficult Conversation Training Gets It Wrong

Here's something that'll ruffle feathers: 73% of managers I've worked with would rather reorganise their entire filing system than have one honest conversation with an underperforming team member. And honestly? I don't blame them.

After seventeen years of watching executives turn into stammering teenagers the moment someone gets emotional, I've come to a controversial conclusion. Most managing difficult conversations training programmes are teaching people to have polite chats, not difficult conversations. There's a massive difference.

The Problem With Playing Nice

Let me paint you a picture. Melbourne, 2019. I'm sitting in a boardroom with a CEO who's just discovered her head of sales has been falsifying reports for eight months. The damage? Close to $400,000 in phantom revenue that never existed.

"How should I approach this conversation?" she asks.

My response surprised her: "Stop thinking about approach. Start thinking about outcome."

This is where most conversation training falls apart spectacularly. We spend so much time teaching people how to cushion the blow that we forget the point isn't comfort—it's resolution.

The uncomfortable truth? Sometimes people need to feel uncomfortable. Sometimes the conversation needs to be difficult.

Why Most Training Misses the Mark

Traditional programmes focus on scripts. "Use this phrase." "Avoid that word." But here's what I've learned watching real conversations in real workplaces: scripts break down the moment human emotion enters the room.

And emotion always enters the room. Always.

I once watched a perfectly trained manager deliver a textbook performance review feedback session. Word-perfect delivery. Professional tone. The works. The employee nodded, smiled, said all the right things. Two weeks later? They'd resigned, citing "feeling unsupported."

The manager had followed every rule in the playbook. But they'd forgotten the most important one: difficult conversations aren't about following rules—they're about connecting with humans who are having a rough day.

What Actually Works (And Why It's Harder)

Forget the sandwich method. Forget softening language. Here's what separates managers who nail these conversations from those who avoid them until someone quits:

1. Get comfortable being the bad guy temporarily. Not permanently—just for the duration of the conversation. Someone has to say the hard thing. If you're the manager, that someone is you.

2. Embrace the awkward silence. When you say something difficult, people need processing time. Don't fill that silence with more words. Let it breathe. The magic happens in those uncomfortable pauses.

3. Stop trying to control their reaction. This one's huge. You can't manage their emotions. You can only manage your own response to their emotions.

I learned this the hard way during a restructure in Brisbane. I was so focused on making the conversation "comfortable" that I spent forty minutes dancing around the actual message. The employee later told me those forty minutes were torture because they knew something was coming but didn't know what.

Sometimes kindness looks like directness.

The Australian Advantage (And Why We Sometimes Waste It)

Here's where I get patriotic: Australians have a natural advantage in difficult conversations. We're culturally comfortable with directness. We don't mind calling a spade a spade.

But then corporate training comes along and teaches us to speak like we're addressing the Queen at a garden party. "I wonder if we might consider the possibility that perhaps there could be room for improvement in..."

Mate, just say what you mean.

Companies like Google and Netflix have figured this out. They've built entire cultures around radical candour—having conversations that are both caring and direct. It's not revolutionary. It's just honest.

The Three Conversations Within Every Difficult Conversation

Every challenging workplace conversation has three layers running simultaneously:

The surface conversation: What we're talking about (performance, behaviour, results).

The relationship conversation: What this means for how we work together going forward.

The identity conversation: What this says about who we are as professionals.

Most training focuses exclusively on the surface. But the real breakthrough happens when you acknowledge all three.

I remember facilitating a session between a department head and their direct report in Sydney. The surface issue was missed deadlines. The relationship issue was trust. The identity issue? The employee felt like a failure.

Once we addressed all three layers, the conversation shifted from defensive to collaborative in about ten minutes. They didn't need better communication techniques. They needed to understand what they were really talking about.

When Difficult Becomes Impossible

Some conversations genuinely can't be salvaged. I've seen managers twist themselves into pretzels trying to have "constructive dialogue" with someone who's already mentally checked out.

Here's a radical thought: sometimes the difficult conversation is admitting the conversation isn't working.

In Perth, I worked with a team where one member was actively undermining every initiative. The manager had tried feedback sessions, coaching conversations, performance improvement plans. Nothing shifted.

The difficult conversation? "This isn't working for either of us. Let's talk about what happens next."

Sometimes the kindest thing you can do is stop pretending there's a fix.

The Bit They Don't Teach You

Traditional dealing with difficult behaviours training focuses on techniques. But here's what actually matters: your state of mind before you walk into the room.

If you're approaching the conversation thinking "How do I get through this?" you've already lost.

If you're approaching it thinking "How do we solve this together?" you might have a chance.

The difference isn't semantic—it's fundamental. One mindset creates adversaries. The other creates collaborators.

Why Most Managers Avoid These Conversations (And Why They Shouldn't)

The data's pretty clear: 67% of managers delay difficult conversations by at least a month. Some delay them until the problem solves itself (spoiler: it rarely does) or until the person leaves (also not ideal).

The irony? The conversations managers dread most are often the ones their team members are desperately waiting for.

People know when they're struggling. They know when something's not working. The silence isn't protecting them—it's torturing them.

The Real Training Most People Need

Forget scripts. Forget techniques. Here's what most managers actually need to practice:

Sitting with discomfort. Both their own and other people's.

Asking better questions. Instead of "How can we fix this?" try "What's really going on here?"

Listening for what's not being said. The real conversation often happens in the spaces between words.

Most training programmes skip this foundation work because it's harder to package into a tidy curriculum. It's easier to teach someone to say "I'd like to discuss some feedback" than to teach them how to stay present when someone starts crying.

But presence is everything in these moments.

The Bottom Line

Difficult conversations aren't difficult because of what we say—they're difficult because of what we're afraid might happen.

Most of the time, what we're afraid of is exactly what needs to happen.

The employee who's been coasting needs to know their job's at risk. The team member who's been disruptive needs to understand the impact. The high performer who's burning out needs someone to notice.

These conversations aren't punishments. They're interventions. And interventions, by definition, interrupt something that isn't working.

Stop making them comfortable. Start making them count.


Related Resources: